GAAC Newsletter July 2002

Edited by Jack Wells

In this Issue:

Editorial : The GAAC
The 2002 AGM
Small Airfields Research project
Airfield News
Planning
Government Policy: Local Aerodromes


Editorial

The GAAC is ten years old this year. It is now more than 10 years ago that the notion of a single body, to handle the issues that were of immediate common interest to all of GA, was mooted by our Chairman at a meeting of the General Aviation Safety Council (GASCo). Initially the General Aviation Awareness Campaign was envisaged as having a life of some 2 years, but it soon became evident that there was a long term challenge and that a more permanent body was needed. Campaign gave way to Council and eventually a limited company was established to formalise the arrangements.
That is history. We may not have been aware of what we were taking on 10 years ago, but the plain fact is that there is a long term task to be undertaken if we are to assure a future for GA.
The main work of the GAAC is conducted away from the public eye and consists of tasks that are not always appreciated by pilots. These include making representations to central government to ensure that GA is recognised in relevant official circles and also responding to any Government consultation documents that have a bearing on GA. There has been quite a spate of these recently. More locally, monitoring County Structure Plans, District Local Plans and even Local Transport Plans continues in the hands of our Planning Co-ordinator.
Were the GAAC not to continue, each GA association would have to undertake the work on its own behalf at a much greater cost overall to the GA movement. Coping with and challenging changes in the planning process — and major changes are contemplated by the Government — can only be tackled effectively if GA acts in a co-ordinated way. The GAAC is the body recognised by the Department for Transport as speaking for GA on planning matters.
It is essential therefore that volunteers are found to keep the organisation running. After 10 years in their posts, and having reached their dotage, it is time for the Chairman and Secretary to stand down. They have again agreed to postpone their retirement and to continue in their posts until 31 October, to enable new arrangements to be put in place.
New brooms are needed to sweep away some of the cobwebs and inject some new life into the organisation. Its importance has to be communicated to all those enjoying the facilities that GA has to offer. It is a failing of GAAC PR that its name rings a bell with very few pilots. This is just one area where a new initiative is called for.
But, where are the volunteers?


Annual General Meeting 2002

The GAAC AGM was held in London on 12 April. Thanks to their generosity it was again held at the Royal Aeronautical Society. I am happy to announce that the Board has been strengthened. We welcome the following to the Board:
Philip Isbell — PFA
Roger Bellingham — BMFA
Charles Henry — Cabair
David Corbett — Flying Farmers Assn

The Board also includes representatives of AOPA, the BGA, the BMAA, GAMTA, the Portsmouth Naval Gliding Club and the Vintage Aircraft Club.


General Aviation Small Airfields Research project


This new venture is being undertaken over a 3-year period. It will study the economic benefits to the community of GA aerodromes. The absence of information on this subject has proved more than an embarrassment when pressing the GA case at public inquiries.
At a recent meeting with the Department for Transport they confirmed their support and willingness to contribute to the cost of the project.


Airfields

The news is, as always, mixed.
East Haxted, near Edenbridge, is seeking a Lawful Development Certificate (LDC). It has operated for 18 years and has evidence to prove it.

Thirleby Fen Planning permission is being sought for 1,000 metre airstrip.

New management at Bristol has agreed to accord grandfather rights to existing GA users. Previously all had been under notice to vacate.

North Weald Wimpey want to build 2,500 houses on the site. The local authority owns the airfield.

Maypole 15 extra movements have been granted on 3 days a year for special events.

Cliffe Marshes is one of the sites being considered as the location for additional runway capacity for the South East. If this were to happen, it would have serious consequences for GA movements. The site is one of particular importance for some 15,000 wading birds and the RSPB is known to be opposed to any development. We are in touch with them to coordinate opposition to the development if the proposal proceeds.

Rochester. The Kent Messenger reports that there were 3,550 objections to the proposed redevelopment of Rochester, said to be the biggest protest to a planning proposal in Britain in the past year.

Sywell Despite a major hiccough at the last moment permission has now been granted to construct a hard runway.

Welshpool is now operating as an unlicensed airfield having been part abandoned.

Sherlowe airstrip is threatened with permanent closure despite the efforts of the owner to interest his neighbours in light aviation. In this instance privacy seems to be of greater concern than any noise disturbance. (See Telford item below)

Rush Green now has an LDC. The owner was particularly appreciative of the planning guidance given by the GAAC in enabling him to obtain the certificate. He underlined the importance of having kept full records of arrivals and departures.

Sherburn-in-Elmet has obtained permission to build an 830m hard runway. This is being financed by the club that owns it.


Planning


In a recent Flyer Forum report the plea was again made by a local pro-aviation Councillor for those interested in the future of GA to
write in to SUPPORT planning applications. He reminds us once again that the planning process is very susceptible to being swayed by a few well written individual letters and that it does not take much account of form letters, and even less of petitions. The Antis know this. He says ‘If there is something you wish to support, write in! And get as many of your mates as you can to do the same.’ This can’t be said too often. (See Rochester note above)
The Telford area local plan is now being updated. At the moment it is said to contain a provision that "there shall be no flying from a private strip in the Telford and Wrekin area." The Planning Office has advised me that public consultation has not yet begun. If you want that provision removed you MUST ask to be sent details at the consultation stage which, I am told, will begin in the autumn. Details available from:
The Area Planning Officer, Telford & Wrekin Council, Darby House, P.O. Box 212, Lawn Central, Telford, Shropshire, TF3 4LB

The Blaenau Gwent Structure Plan embodies word for word the GA planning policy proposed by the GAAC.

Plan Scrutiny. Since the AGM in April our Planning Coordinator has handled a further 7 Structure Plans, 9 Local Plans, 14 UDPs and 4 other plans.

Planning and Operational Guidance for Flying Sites. AOPA has produced a brief summary paper for the benefit of aerodrome operators and owners (potential and existing). It looks at the establishment of new sites, proposed changes to existing operations, Lawful Development Certificates, planning applications, appeals and enforcement matters. Copies are available from the GAAC office.


Government Policy: Local aerodromes


Our Chairman wrote to the Minister for Aviation earlier this year asking that central government should be more involved in the provision of a national network of GA aerodromes. Despite their claim to support the development of an integrated transport system the Minister reiterated the long standing policy that ’ decisions about the future of aerodromes must be a matter for their owners. It would not be right for Government to attempt to direct from the centre what are essentially local issues. Government cannot force an aerodrome, whether publicly or privately owned, to stay open if the owner/operator is determined for business or other reasons to close it.’ Obviously further educational effort is required to get the message through to a Government that is committed to an integrated transport policy that a network of aerodromes for the UK is part of the national transport infrastructure.

GAAC July 2002